The ghost of partition is haunting us even today. I am no admirer of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, but Jaswant Singh is right in trying to peel off years and years of falsification of the truth behind India's partition. His 'Jinnah - India, Partition, Independence' is a path-breaking book.

Jaswant Singh has lifted the curtains from some embarrassing but true incidents leading to the vivisection of India. He has described the 'epic journey of Jinnah from being the ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity, the liberal constitutionalist and Indian nationalist to the Quaid-e-Azam of Pakistan'. He has contested the popular Indian view that Jinnah was the villain of the 1947 partition. So, why all this hue and cry?

It is a pity the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has demonized a man of Jaswant Singh's stature in the same manner as Jinnah has been demonized. The way his book has been banned in Gujarat and the manner in which he has been ousted from the BJP are tragic.

India's partition is a complex and complicated issue. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, a nationalist to the core, too has faulted Jawaharlal Nehru as well as Sardar Vallabhai Patel for the 1947 tragedy that caused so much agony and suffering.

Azad accused Nehru of being lured into partition by Lady Edwina Mountbatten, with whom he (Nehru) was friendly. Azad also felt that Patel was the one mainly responsible for the break-up of India. Page 201 of the 1988 edition of his 'India Wins Freedom' states: 'I was surprised that Patel was now an even greater supporter of the two-nation theory than Jinnah. Jinnah may have raised the flag of partition but now the real flag bearer was Patel.' That proves Jaswant Singh's point.

Jaswant Singh isn't wrong when he states that Jinnah was a nationalist leader.